A Review of Among Friends by Hal Ebbott
This title was published on June 24, 2025 by Riverhead Books.
*SPOILER ALERT* This review contains plot details of Among Friends.
I love a dysfunctional family saga. Whether in a novel, a movie, or a TV show, I thrive off familial dynamics. So, when I read the synopsis for Hal Ebbott’s debut novel, Among Friends, I knew it was going to the top of my to-be-read list The story follows two lifelong friends, Amos and Emerson, who reunite for an intimate, affluent birthday celebration at Emerson’s country home. What begins as a quiet weekend among friends slowly fractures, revealing how privilege can bury the truth.
From the beginning, everything feels unsettled. The characters perform under a façade—off-key, out of tune. Tensions simmer beneath surface-level smiles. Conversations are awkward. Old grudges linger. Wives smile through tight jaws. Among Friends features all the tropes complete with a large manor house and a group of wealthy friends. So, I settled in for what I thought would be a good ol’ domestic drama.
At first, I wondered when we’d get to the action, specifically the “shocking betrayal” the blurb teased. The slow burn was off-putting at first, and I was getting impatient. But in hindsight, it was a good thing Ebbott didn’t drop us directly into the action: it allowed time to explore his characters and understand their motivations, what makes them tick, and where their loyalties lie.
Emerson is the most complex character and perhaps the most well-written—a Jekyll and Hyde figure who can instantly flip from charm to unbridled cruelty. Ebbott describes him as having “lethal intelligence like what exists in a wolf.” His inner rage and entitlement, bolstered by years of unchecked self-importance, are chilling. And yet, his thoughts sometimes feel disturbingly universal, that feeling when teasing goes too far, when resentment crawls closer between two friends. Ebbott asks, what happens when you can’t take it anymore?
Truth be told, I was expecting something completely different from Among Friends. I tried searching for clues of an affair, a scandal, something more conventional. So, when Emerson sexually assaults his Amos’s daughter, Anna, during the party, it’s a brutal shock. On the one hand, Ebbott gives no clear warning this is imminent. But on the other, it had been part of Emerson’s nature all along. The uneasy silences, the flashes of rage.
Every time we’re immersed into Emerson’s headspace, it gave me chills. There’s a sense of entitlement at claiming Anna’s body and a pride of sorts, fortified by his social status. There’s a poignant line that encapsulates the predatory nature of men like him, “He inhabited the world as though it were a restaurant: a place to order, eat, and then leave.” He sees the assault as an “adventure,” knowing he can get away with it—a fuzzy memory that brings him a wolfish “thrill.” It’s uncomfortable to read, but I enjoyed how Ebbott forced us to sit with the knowledge, knowing this behavior often goes unchecked.
The second half of the novel is a testament to Ebbott’s writing. When the truth of Emerson’s assault comes out, the characters spiral. They aren’t strangers; they’re lifelong friends enmeshed by privilege. Reactions range from denial and quiet rage to deflection, with Anna’s own mother resolute in her conviction that “kids—girls especially” lie. Amos, on the other hand, immediately moves to comfort his daughter when she confides in him, angry with himself for not knowing. But with Emerson, the consequences are nonexistent, and he simply feels “there was nothing to do but move on” and thinks “of it far less than he would’ve guessed.” This casual detachment was done masterfully by Ebbott. It wasn’t over-dramatized but scarily mundane. There is no remorse, just a shrug and indifference.
Of all the characters, Amos is the most frustrating. As someone who’s risen through the social hierarchy, he wavers between action and complacency unsure where he stands when it comes to Emerson, the man who helped mold his path to riches. His wife, Claire, born into privilege, acts as a mouthpiece for the wealthy. She refuses to believe her daughter, and her dismissive line, “Wasn’t there a glory in wounds?” echoes the disbelief often thrown at survivors. She’s dangerously comfortable in complicity, favoring denial over discomfort.
Retsy, Emerson’s wife, is perhaps the most mysterious figure in Among Friends. We only get glimpses into her mind, yet she sees through him more clearly than anyone else. She understands him from the smallest gestures, how “his withholding of laughter, for instance, or the way, by merely touching his chin, he could make clear how unwanted you were.” She believes the accusations, “he’d done it—she knew that he had,” but her decision to stay with him feels tragically understandable. To leave would mean uprooting her entire life. And the wealthy cannot fathom such a loss.
It seems like justice might prevail—the scales finally shifting, a peripeteia of sorts. However, as someone whose favorite novel is Atonement, I should’ve recognized the warning signs—the too-neat ending Ebbott wrapped up with a little bow. This catharsis is simply an illusion, and Ebbott pulls the rug out right at the last second. I understand some readers will feel cheated by the ending, and to an extent, I agree. At first, it felt like a cop-out, the equivalent of the “and it was all a dream” ending. However, after sitting with the book for a while, it felt painfully realistic, as men like Emerson walk away unscathed every day, their reputations intact. Justice would never be served.
“Why pick fights when it cost so little to just get along.” Among Friends isn’t just about rich people behaving badly. It’s about complicity and how people would rather maintain the status quo than confront the darkness that keeps them comfortable. And Ebbott did that devastatingly.
And for a debut? I see good things for Ebbott.